No clear winner when it comes to antifreeze protein efficiency

Ever since biologist Arthur DeVries discovered antifreeze proteins in Antarctic fish in the 1960’s, researchers have tried to unravel the mystery behind these remarkable proteins. Thanks to the proteins in their body fluids these fish, and other extremophiles, do not freeze in the cold environment in which they live. The antifreeze proteins, of which there are several varieties, attach to small ice crystals, thereby hindering their growth. So while ice may form in the blood, the crystals are so small that the blood is not deprived of its functions.

Despite the many steps taken in the last decades to understand the workings of the antifreeze proteins, some important questions were still left unanswered. Thanks to an international collaboration between experts in the Netherlands (TU/e and FOM institute AMOLF), the United States (University of Illinois) and Canada (Queen’s University) researchers have now put together important pieces of the puzzle. They published their findings in PNAS on March 2nd, 2016.

Two methods
Roughly speaking, antifreeze proteins function in two ways. On the one hand, they reduce the temperature at which ice crystals begin to grow rapidly, which is called thermal hysteresis (TH). On the other hand, they use ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI), a process in which they hinder small ice crystals from clustering into larger chunks. However, the relationship between these two activities of antifreeze proteins has long been unclear.

This week, the international team of researchers revealed that there actually is no clear relationship between the two activities and that there are also significant differences per protein. This also means that it is not so easy, as had long been thought, to determine how ‘active’ a protein is. Sometimes the TH activity is the most important factor, but more often it is the IRI activity that appears to be the determining factor. This conflicts with the prevailing view that one protein activity is clearly dominant. It also means that chemists might have been looking at the wrong candidates to produce artificial imitations.

Spectroscopy
In the past years Konrad Meister (postdoc in the group of AMOLF director Huib Bakker) has been successful using ultrafast spectroscopy techniques to study how the antifreeze proteins hinder the growth of ice crystals. He went on several expeditions to Antarctica to catch the fish together with members of the research team led by Arthur DeVries (University of Illinois).

In 2015 Konrad Meister received a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions grant (165.000 euro) for his research on antifreeze proteins.

Reference
Luuk L. C. Olijve, Konrad Meister, Arthur L. DeVries, John G. Duman, Shuaiqi Guof, Huib J. Bakker and Ilja K. Voets, Blocking rapid ice crystal growth through nonbasal plane adsorption of antifreeze proteins PNAS (2016) | DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524109113

Most recent news items

All news items

People and recognition

Four PhD candidates close their AMOLF chapter

Four PhD students defended their thesis and are about to take the next steps in their career. Congratulations to Colin Meulblok (Mechanical Metamaterials), Francesca Scalerandi (Hybrid Nanosystems), Vashist Gangigude Ramesh (Interacting Photons), and Parisa Omidvar (Hypersmart Matter). We wish you all the best in your next steps!

Read news item

People and recognition

Joining forces to study perovskite interfaces

AMOLF group leaders Professor Wiebke Albrecht and Professor Bruno Ehrler have received an NWO ENW-M2 grant for their joint research project, The Dynamic Atomic Interface between Halide Perovskites and Metals. The insights gained will pave the way for sustainable, high-performance solar energy and information technology. Wiebke and Bruno will each hire a PhD student for this project. The grant amounts to €800.000.

Read news item

People and recognition

Wim Noorduin and Arian van Asten presenting their scientific journey

On October 8, Professor Wim Noorduin and his collaborator Professor Arian van Asten (University of Amsterdam) presented their scientific journey in a video to the audience at the ‘Avond van Wetenschap en Maatschappij’. They did so alongside the other nominees for the Huibregtsen Prize.

Read news item

Research highlights

Natural phenomena ‘hyperuniform disorder’ enables highly efficient, thin silicon solar cells

Silicon solar panels are rigid and heavy, and many rooftops cannot support them. This creates a need for thin, flexible solar cells that can be integrated into building materials. However, making silicon solar cells thinner makes it harder to trap light inside the material. Researchers in the 3D Photovoltaics group found a fascinating way to overcome this challenge using a phenomenon called hyperuniform disorder. They publish their findings in the journal ACS Photonics.

The researchers were able to make highly efficient silicon solar cell materials that are 30 times thinner than conventional ones. They managed to do this by integrating a layer of nanometer sized structures on top of the material. Up close, this pattern looks random, but it is remarkably when you step back: no clumps, no gaps, and no repeating pattern. This is called hyperuniform disorder (or HUD).

Read news item